SYNTHESIS OF ROBUST OPTIMAL CONTROL PROGRAM FOR AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR TURNING GUIDE VANES

Authors

  • Kateryna Ugryumova
  • Ievhen Meniailov
  • Iryna Trofymova
  • Mykhaylo Ugryumov
  • Andriy Myenyaylov

Keywords:

stochastic optimization, evolutionary methods, jet engines, multistage axial flow compressor, tolerance selection

Abstract

The method of solving the selecting turning guide vanes law of control problem for the multistage axial flow compressor is proposed in order to ensure maximum efficiency along the operating line while maintaining specified stability margins under the uncertainty of input data. The problem under consideration belongs to a class of multi-objective stochastic optimization problems with mixed conditions. Evolutionary computational method of solution synthesis of the problems belonging to this class is developed based on the genetic algorithm. The implementation example of proposed method for selecting law of control for turning inlet at first four stages guide vanes of multistage axial flow compressor (MSAFC) of modern helicopter jet engine is considered. The problem of technological tolerance selecting the stagger angles of compressor blade rows in order to provide the specified confidence intervals based on integral performance parameters is solved. The examples of solving the problem using determined and stochastic formulations are given.

References

V. I. Anukhin, Fits and Tolerances, tutorial, St. Petersburg, Publishing House of SPbSTU, 2008, 207 p. (in Russian)

V. I. Zakharov, Interchangeability, the Quality of Production and Engineering, St. Petersburg, Lenizdat, 1990, 302 p. (in Russian)

I. Yakushev, L.N. Vorontsov, and N.M. Fedotov, Interchangeability, Standardization and Technical Measurements, textbook, Moscow, Engineering, 1987, 352 p. (in Russian)

A. E. Gelfand, S. K. Ghosh, “Model choice: A minimum posterior predictive loss,” Biometrika, vol. 85, issue 1, pp. 1-11, 1998.

A. A. Giunta, M. S. Eldred, L. P. Swiler, T. G. Trucano, and S. F. Wojtkiewicz, “Perspectives on optimization under uncertainty: algorithms and applications,” Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, New York, 30 August – 1 September 2004, pp. 1-10.

T. Gneiting, A. E. Raftery, “Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 102, no. 477, pp. 359–378, 2007.

T. Erfani, S. V. Utyuzhnikov, “Control of robust design in multiobjective optimization under uncertainties,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 45, issue 2, pp. 247–256, 2012.

L. Brevault, M. Balesdent, N. Berend, and R. Le Riche, “Multi-level hierarchical MDO formulation with functional coupling satisfaction under uncertainty, application to sounding rocket design,” Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation, Sydney, Australia, June 7 -12, 2015, pp. 186-205.

S. Lee, D. Rhee, and K. Yee, “Optimal arrangement of the film cooling Holes considering the manufacturing tolerance for high pressure turbine nozzle,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, Seoul, South Korea, June 13–17, 2016, pp. 793-803.

C. Hirsch, Non-deterministic Simulation for CFD-Based Design Methodologies (NODESIM-CFD), Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Project no: AST5-CT-2006-030959/ Publishable summary report D1.1-06, Brussels, Belgium, NUMECA, 2010, 11 p.

C. Hirsch, D. Wunsch, J. Szumbarski, L. Laniewski-Wollk, J. Pons-Prats, “Uncertainty management for robust industrial design in aeronautics: Finding and best practice collected during UMRIDA, a Collaborative Research Project (2013-2016) Funded by the European Union,” Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanic and Multidisciplinary Design, Springer, 2019, 818 p.

Sigma technology, Robust Design Optimization and Robust Optimal Control, 2018. [Online]. Available at: http://www.iosotech.com/robust.htm

I. N. Egorov, G. V. Kretinin, “Optimization of gas turbine engine elements by probability criteria,” Proceedings of the ASME 1993 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, May 24–27, 1993, pp. 1-8.

Robust design & reliability, ESTECO's Integration Platform for Multi-objective and Multi-disciplinary Optimization, 2018 [Online]. Available at: http://www.esteco.com/modefrontier/robust-design-reliability

Isight & the Simulia Execution Engine, Process Automation and Design Exploration, 2018 [Online]. Available at: http://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/isight-simulia-execution-engine/

A. Van der Velden, P. Koch, Insight Design Optimization Methodologies, ASM Handbook, vol. 22B Application of Metal Processing Simulations, Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France, 2010, 24 р.

Dynamic Software & Engineering, OptiSLang: Software for Sensitivity Analysis, Multiobjective and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Robustness Evaluation, Reliability Analysis and Robust Design Optimization, 2018ю [Online]. Available at: www.dynardo.de/en/software/optislang.html

NUMECA, FINE™/Design3D: An Integrated Environment for the Design and Optimization of Turbomachinery Channels and Blades, 2017. [Online]. Available at: http://www.numeca.com/product/finedesign3d

NUMECA Int., “Orientation of NUMECA at innovations in CFD, multiphysics design, analysis and optimization,” Leuven, Belgium, issue 3 (62), pp. 71-72, 2014.

Y. M. Ermolev, Methods of Stochastic Programming, Moscow, Nauka, Fizmatgiz, 1976, 240 p. (in Russian)

X.-S. Yang, Cuckoo Search and Firefly Algorithm: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 2014, 360 p.

D. Karaboga, S. Okdem, “A simple and global optimization algorithm for engineering problems: Differential evolution algorithm,” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 53–60, 2004.

S.A. Ayvazyan, Z.I. Bezhaeva, O.V. Staroverov, Multivariate Observation Classification, Moscow, Statistics, 1974, 240 p.

W.R. Ashby, Introduction to Cybernetics, London, Chapman & Hall, 1956, 295 p.

I. Meniailov, O. Khustochka, K. Ugryumova, S. Сhernysh, S. Yepifanov, and M. Ugryumov, “Mathematical models and methods of effective estimation in multi-objective optimization problems under uncertainties,” Proceedings of the 12th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (WCSMO12), Braunschweig, Germany, June 5–9, 2017, pp. 411-427.

V. Goncharsky, A. S. Leonov, and A. G. Yagola, “Generalized discrepancy principle,” Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, issue 2, pp. 294–302, 1973. (in Russian)

M. L. Ugryumov, A. A. Tronchuk, V. E. Afanasjevska, and A.V. Myenyaylov, “Gas turbine engine elements systematic improvement on the base of inverse problem concept by stochastic optimization methods,” Abstracts Book and CD–ROM Proceedings of the 20-th ISABE Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011, article no. 2011–1255.

A. V. Menyailov, A. A, Tronchuk, and E. M. Ugryumova, “Application of evolutionary methods for solving optimization gas turbine compressor,” Aerospace Techniques and Technology, issue 5 (52), pp. 59–65, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-27

How to Cite

Ugryumova, K., Meniailov, I., Trofymova, I., Ugryumov, M., & Myenyaylov, A. (2020). SYNTHESIS OF ROBUST OPTIMAL CONTROL PROGRAM FOR AXIAL FLOW COMPRESSOR TURNING GUIDE VANES. International Journal of Computing, 19(3), 347-354. Retrieved from http://computingonline.net/computing/article/view/1882

Issue

Section

Articles