IOT STATUS COMMUNICATION FOR HOME AUTOMATION

Authors

  • Tyler Nicholas Edward Steane
  • PJ Radcliffe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.18.3.1516

Keywords:

Home Automation, IoT, M2M, Network protocol.

Abstract

The vast majority of home automation systems depend on a permanent central controller and this is the source of many serious problems. The controller may be eliminated by using one or more Intermittent Control Devices such as a smartphone, but the responsibilities of the controller must be redistributed. This paper considers the problem of keeping multiple intermittent controllers up-to-date with status information for devices around the home. Four protocols are proposed, taking key lessons from existing network protocols, and then implemented, tested and compared with the expected performance of UPnP. All four protocols outperform UPnP and further analysis shows that these protocols can be implemented in a robust and user-friendly manner. A comparison of the packet efficiency of these protocols demonstrates that the combination of device registration and packet broadcasting makes for the most efficient protocol and should form the basis of devices status communications in home automation systems without a permanent central controller.

References

T. N. E. Steane and P. J. Radcliffe, “A universal iot joining protocol for DIY applications,” Proceedings of the 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference , 2017, pp. 1–3.

T. N. E. Steane and P. J. Radcliffe, “A novel discovery protocol for IoT based home automation,” International Journal of Automation and Smart Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 147-158, 2019.

T. N. E. Steane and P. J. Radcliffe, “Multiple intermittent controllers for IoT home automation,” Proceedings of the 2018 28th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, 2018, pp. 1–6.

“MQTT” [Online]. Available at: http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/mqtt-v3.1.1.html.

Z. Shelby, K. Hartke, and C. Bormann, “The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP).” [Online]. Available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252.

A. Panwar, A. Singh, R. Kumawat, S. Jaidka, and K. Garg, “Eyrie smart home automation using Internet of Things,” Proceedings of the 2017 Computing Conference, 2017, pp. 1368–1370.

P. Jutadhamakorn, T. Pillavas, V. Visoottiviseth, R. Takano, J. Haga, and D. Kobayashi, “A scalable and low-cost MQTT broker clustering system,” Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT), 2017, pp. 1–5.

F. J. Bellido-Outeirino, J. M. Flores-Arias, E. J. Palacios-Garcia, V. Pallares-Lopez, and D. Matabuena-Gomez-Limon, “M2M home data interoperable management system based on MQTT,” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 7th International Conference on Consumer Electronics ICCE, Berlin, 2017, pp. 200–202.

R. K. Kodali and S. Soratkal, “MQTT based home automation system using ESP8266,” Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference, 2016, pp. 1–5.

J. Prabaharan, A. Swamy, A. Sharma, K. N. Bharath, P. R. Mundra, and K. J. Mohammed, “Wireless home automation and security system using MQTT protocol,” Proceedings of the 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information Communication Technology (RTEICT), 2017, pp. 2043–2045.

S. Spinsante et al., “A LoRa enabled building automation architecture based on MQTT,” Proceedings of the 2017 AEIT International Annual Conference, 2017, pp. 1–5.

I. Florea, R. Rughinis, L. Ruse, and D. Dragomir, “Survey of standardized protocols for the Internet of Things,” Proceedings of the 2017 21st International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS), 2017, pp. 190–196.

L. Mainetti, V. Mighali, and L. Patrono, “An android multi-protocol application for heterogeneous building automation systems,” Proceedings of the 2014 22nd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 2014, pp. 121–127.

O. Bergmann, K. T. Hillmann, and S. Gerdes, “A CoAP-gateway for smart homes,” Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2012, pp. 446–450.

O. Bergmann, S. Gerdes, S. Schäfer, F. Junge, and C. Bormann, “Secure bootstrapping of nodes in a CoAP network,” Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), 2012, pp. 220–225.

M. N. Sahana, S. Anjana, S. Ankith, K. Natarajan, K. R. Shobha, and A. Paventhan, “Home energy management leveraging open IoT protocol stack,” Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems (RAICS), 2015, pp. 370–375.

M. Amadeo, C. Campolo, A. Iera, and A. Molinaro, “Information centric networking in IoT scenarios: The case of a smart home,” Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2015, pp. 648–653.

S. Son, N. Kim, B. Lee, C. H. Cho, and J. W. Chong, “A time synchronization technique for coap-based home automation systems,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 10–16, 2016.

K. Hartke, “Observing resources in the constrained application protocol (CoAP).” [Online]. Available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/-rfc7641#section-5.

J. Joshi et al., “Performance enhancement and IoT based monitoring for smart home,” Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), 2017, pp. 468–473.

UPnP Forum, “UPnP Device Architecture 2.0,” 2015. [Online]. Available at: http://upnp.org/specs/arch/UPnP-arch-DeviceArchitecture-v2.0.pdf.

O. Tarasyuk, A. Gorbenko, V. Kharchenko, and T. Hollstein, “Contention window adaptation to ensure airtime consumption fairness in multirate Wi-Fi networks,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Technologies 2014, 2014, pp. 344–349.

A. Gorbenko, A. Romanovsky, V. Kharchenko, and O. Tarasyuk, “Dependability of service-oriented computing: Time-probabilistic failure modelling,” Proceedings of the Software Engineering for Resilient Systems, 2012, pp. 121–133.

R. Shingledecker, “Tiny Core Linux” [Online]. Available at: https://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/welcome.html.

https://bitbucket.org/tylersteane/dhap-iot-status-communication-for-home-automation

The software that empowers, GNS3, [Online]. Available at: https://www.gns3.com/.

W. O. Galitz, The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to Guidesign Principles and Techniques, Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Steane, T. N. E., & Radcliffe, P. (2019). IOT STATUS COMMUNICATION FOR HOME AUTOMATION. International Journal of Computing, 18(3), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.18.3.1516

Issue

Section

Articles