ONTOGENETIC TEACHING OF MOBILE AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS WITH DYNAMIC NEUROCONTROLLERS

Authors

  • Helmut A. Mayer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.3.1.251

Keywords:

Mobile Autonomous Robots, Dynamic Neurocontrollers, Artificial Neuromodulators, Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

After a brief survey of work dealing with dynamic neurocontrollers changing their internal structure during the “lifetime” of a mobile autonomous robot, we present experiments employing a standard sensor–motor neurocontroller with self–adapting weights. The change of behavior of the robot is linked to inputs from the environment that cause the emission of artificial neuromodulators (ANMs) in the robot’s neurocontroller. In its simplest form an outside teacher (human or machine) constantly evaluates the robot’s actions by transmitting positive or negative feedback signals to the robot initiating the internal changes. The focus of investigations is put on the mechanisms of the interaction of teaching input and structural changes. A well–known concept for this interaction is Hebbian learning, which is regulated by ANMs in the presented approach. In extension to related work in evolutionary robotics (ER), we analyze important details of robotic (ontogenetic) learning by experiments measuring the ability of robots to learn simple tasks in a simulated environment without employing evolution. Specifically, we are interested in the comparison of Hebb learning variants, and the crucial question of the correct interpretation of reward or punishment signals by the robot.

References

Stefano Nolfi and Dario Floreano. Evolutionary Robotics – The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self–Organizing Machines. MIT Press, 2000.

G. M. Shepherd. Neurobiology. Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 1994.

Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

William D. Smart and Leslie Pack Kaelbling. Effective Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2002.

Akio Ishiguro, Siji Tokura, Toshiyuki Kondo, Yoshiki Uchikawa, and Peter Eggenberger. Reduction of the Gap between Simulated and Real Environments in Evolutionary Robotics: A Dynamically–Rearranging Neural Network Approach. In IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference, pages III – 239–244. IEEE, October 1999.

Tom M. C. Smith and A. Philippides. Nitric Oxide Signalling in Real and Artificial Neural Networks. British Telecom Technology Journal, 18(4): 140–149, October 2000.

E. Oja, J. Karhunen, L. Wang, and R. Vigario. Principal and Independent Components in Neural Networks – Recent Developments. Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology, 1996.

S. Nolfi, O. Miglino, and D. Parisi. Phenotypic Plasticity in Evolving Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the First Conference From Perception to Action. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.

Gerald M. Edelman. Neural Darwinism – The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. Basic Books, New York, 1987.

Jari Vaario, Akira Onitsuka, and Katsuo Shimohara. Formation of Neural Structures. In Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Articial Life, pages 214–223. MIT Press, 1997.

Dario Floreano and Francesco Mondada. Evolutionary neurocontrollers for autonomous mobile robots. Neural Networks, 11(1998): 1461–1478, 1998.

L. Steels and R. Brooks, editors. Building Situated Embodied Agents. The Alife route to AI., New Haven, 1995. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.

Luc Steels. The origins of intelligence. In Proceedings of the Carlo Erba Foundation, Meeting on Artificial Life, 1996.

Luc Steels. The Spontaneous Self–organization of an Adaptive Language. In S. Muggleton, editor, Machine Intelligence 15, Oxford, 1996. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-01

How to Cite

Mayer, H. A. (2014). ONTOGENETIC TEACHING OF MOBILE AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS WITH DYNAMIC NEUROCONTROLLERS. International Journal of Computing, 3(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.3.1.251

Issue

Section

Articles