Applying the Project Portfolio Management Maturity Level Selection Method to an Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.21.2.2588Keywords:
project portfolio, management, maturity level, cost, assessment, optimization, selection, applicationAbstract
The purpose of the paper is to create and apply a method for selecting the maturity level of an organization in the field of project portfolio management. A method for assessing the maturity level of an organization in the field of project portfolio management is proposed. The method is based on assessing the application of principles, functions, life cycle, specialized organizational structure, prescribed roles, and responsibilities for their implementation in managing a portfolio of projects. A distinctive feature of the method is that the evaluation uses a generalized table of project portfolio management processes. The functions performed should be reflected in this table. A method is proposed for choosing the maturity level of an organization’s project portfolio management based on the optimization of the maturity level and costs of project portfolio management. The method is applied to select a rational level of maturity of project portfolio management for a technical university.
References
The Standard for Portfolio Management, 4th ed., PMI, 2017.
SAFe 5 for Lean Enterprises, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://www.scaledagileframework.com/
The Scrum@Scale Guide, Version 2.1, January 2021, 2021, 22 p.
I. Kononenko and M. Kpodjedo, “Method of selecting the maturity level of an organization when managing a project portfolio,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 15th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies, (CSIT), 2020, 2, pp. 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSIT49958.2020.9321958.
J. Batista Sarmento dos Santos-Neto, A. P. Cabral Seixas Costa “Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 13, issue 5, pp. 719-769, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2019.1575986.
T. L. Reis, M. A. S. Mathias, O. J. Oliveira, “Maturity models: identifying the state-of-the-art and the scientific gaps from a bibliometric study,” Scientometrics, vol. 110, issue 2, pp. 643–672, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2182-0.
T. de Bruin, M. Rosemann, R. Freeze and U. Kulkarni, “Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model,” Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems ACIS’2005, Sydney, NSW, Australia, November 29 – December 2, 2005.
M. Röglinger, J. Pöppelbuß, J. Becker, “Maturity models in business process management,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 328-346, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151211225225.
T. Mettler, “Maturity assessment models: A design science research approach,” International Journal of Society Systems Science, vol. 3, issue 1–2, pp. 81–98, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934.
W. Guédria, Y. Naudet, D. Chen, “Maturity model for enterprise interoperability,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 1-28, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2013.805246.
G. Leal, W. Guédria, H. Panetto and M. Lezoche, “Towards a comparative analysis of interoperability assessment approaches for collaborative enterprise systems,” Proceedings of the 23rd IPSE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, Curitiba, Brazil. October, 2016, pp.45-54.
T. Ford, J. Colombi, S. Graham and D. Jacques, “The interoperability score,” Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER2007), volume 1, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, March, 2007.
ISACA. CMMI Performance Solutions, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi
Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®), third ed., PMI, 2013.
Organisational Competence Baseline for Developing Competence in Managing by Projects, IPMA, 2016.
Portfolio, Programme & Project Management Maturity Model (P3M3), Version 1.0, Office of Government Commerce (OGC), Crown, 2006.
H. Kerzner, Using the Project Management Maturity Model. Strategic Planning for Project Management, third ed., Wiley, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119559078.
Integrated Project Portfolio Management, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://ppm.express/blog/introduction-to-portfolio-management-a-ppm-maturity-model
S. Nikkhou, K. Taghizadeh, S. Hajiyakhchali, “Designing a portfolio management maturity model (Elena),” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 226, pp. 318–325, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.194.
ITM Platform. Projects. Programs. Portfolio, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://www.itmplatform.com/en/blog/ppm-maturity-level-what-is-it-and-next-steps-towards-growth/
Acuity PPM, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://acuityppm.com/ppm-solutions/ppm-maturity-assessment/
H. Solli Sæther, P. Gottschalk, “Maturity in IT outsourcing relationships: an exploratory study of client companies,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 635-649, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810876769.
D. Jin, K.-H. Chai, K.-C. Tan, “New service development maturity model,” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 86-116, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0134.
I. Kononenko and M. Kpodjedo, “The basics of the project portfolio management generalized body of knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2021), Slavsko, Lviv region, Ukraine, February 16-18, 2021. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org) Vol-2851, pp. 271-282.
Soft Online, 2021, [Online]. Available at: https://softonline.com.ua/catalog/atlassian/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
International Journal of Computing is an open access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:• Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
• Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
