Website Quality Measurement of Educational Government Agency in Indonesia using Modified WebQual 4.0

Authors

  • Rintho Rante Rerung
  • Arief Ramadhan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.23.1.3432

Keywords:

Website Quality, WebQual 4.0, Higher Education Service Institution, Formal Website

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the quality of the Region III Higher Education Service Institution (RHSI3) website using the modified WebQual 4.0. This evaluation needs to be carried out to find out things that need to be improved on the website so that it can satisfy its users. Based on the evaluation results, it can be seen that the overall average score of the RHSI3 website measurement is 568.50 with an interpretation of 69.33%, so it is included in the Good criteria. There are six indicators that get a score above the average while there are four indicators that get a score below the average. The indicator that gets the highest score is the indicator about the simplicity of learning to operate the RHSI3 website. This indicator gets a score of 808 with an interpretation of 98.58%, so it is included in the Excellent criteria. The indicator that gets the lowest score is whether the website provides a space for the community. The indicator only gets a score of 216 with an interpretation of 26.34%, so it is included in the Bad criteria. To improve the quality of the website, it is necessary to improve several indicators that get a low score interpretation value, i.e., providing detailed information, a space for the community, and making it easier to communicate with organizations. From an academic point of view, this study contributes to the modifications of WebQual 4.0 as well as gives examples of how to use it. From a practical point of view, the results of this study can be a reference for RHSI3 website managers regarding things that need to be considered and improved to make their website quality better.

References

R. R. Rerung, M. Fauzan, and H. Hermawan, “Website quality measurement of higher education services institution region IV using Webqual 4.0 method,” International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2020, https://doi.org/10.25008/ijadis.v1i2.185.

S. J. Barnes and R. Vidgen, “Measuring Web site quality improvements: a case study of the forum on strategic management knowledge exchange,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 297–309, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570310477352.

R. R. Rerung, A. Wahvuni, Rinasari, and I. Susrini, “Blueprint of smart campus system using TOGAF ADM,” Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED), 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415824.

R. M. Fuller, M. K. Harding, L. Luna, and J. D. Summers, “The impact of E-commerce capabilities on online retailer performance: Examining the role of timing of adoption,” Information & Management, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 103584, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103584.

F. Fernández-Bonilla, C. Gijón, and B. de la Vega, “E-commerce in Spain: Determining factors and the importance of the e-trust,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 102280, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102280.

S. Doguchaeva, O. Fedorova, and G. Mityashin, “Delivery services for green e-commerce,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 2158–2164, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.242.

M. Cherkasova, V. Sirotkin, and A. Kostyukov, “E-learning for transportation professionals (post graduate program) during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 254–263, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.011.

D. Raccanello et al., “Higher education students’ achievement emotions and their antecedents in e-learning amid COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country survey,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 80, p. 101629, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101629.

J. Gao, “Level-based E-government cloud cross-domain access control technology,” Proceedings of the 2021 20th International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications for Business Engineering and Science (DCABES), December 2021, pp. 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCABES52998.2021.00020.

S.-C. Shin, J.-W. Ho, and V. Y. Pak, “Digital transformation through e-government innovation in Uzbekistan,” Proceedings of the 2020 22nd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), February 2020, pp. 632–639. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061507.

M. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and J. Paul, “Role of social media on mobile banking adoption among consumers,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 180, p. 121720, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121720.

C.-W. Liu, “Online banking and women’s increasing bargaining power in marriage: A case study in a ‘Taobao village’ of southern Fujian,” Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 92, p. 102597, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102597.

X. Zhang, S. Zhang, and L. Lu, “The banking instability and climate change: Evidence from China,” Energy Economics, vol. 106, p. 105787, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105787.

S. F. Verkijika and L. de Wet, “A usability assessment of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 39, pp. 20–29, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.003.

H. Hong, “Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships,” Public Relations Review, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 346–356, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.007.

C. H. Kanter, “Role of Manado’s government website in supporting the actualization of good governance,” Journal of Communication and Public Opinion Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 197–121, 2015. (in Indonesian).

S. A. Khalid and R. Q. Lavilles, “Maturity assessment of local e-government websites in the Philippines,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 161, pp. 99–106, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.104.

Y. Zhang and F. A. Kimathi, “Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective,” Technology in Society, vol. 69, p. 101942, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101942.

J. Y. Lee, W. H. Kim, and C. R. Kim, “Measuring service quality and customer satisfaction in online trading services on smart phones,” Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, May 2011, pp. 485–489. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2011.6014771.

K. D. Hartomo and M. R. Ramadhan, “Quality evaluation in disaster mitigation information system using Webqual 4.0 method,” Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Innovative and Creative Information Technology (ICITech), Sep. 2021, pp. 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITech50181.2021.9590176.

Maryani, B. Mahesworo, A. S. Perbangsa, and H. Hendarti, “User interface evaluation on government knowledge management portal using Webqual 4.0,” Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), August 2019, pp. 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843780.

R. Nilpong and B. Thanasopon, “Factors affecting intention to use of government websites in Thai elder: The Webqual model,” Proceedings of the 2020 12th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE), October 2020, pp. 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEE49829.2020.9271711.

S. Lee-Geiller and T. (David) Lee, “Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 208–225, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003.

A. M. Al-smadi, A. Abugabah, and A. al Smadi, “Evaluation of e-learning experience in the light of the Covid-19 in higher education,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 201, pp. 383–389, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.03.051.

Rismayani and Y. J. W. Soetikno, “Using WebQual 4.0 for measuring quality of e-learning services during COVID-19 pandemic,” Proceedings of the 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), October 2020, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268887.

E. Hasmin, N. Aini, S. Aisa, Nurdiansah, R. Ramanda, and Jumardi, “Evaluation of news’s website with Webqual and importance performance analysis,” Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), October 2021, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS52787.2021.9649501.

P. Rita, T. Oliveira, and A. Farisa, “The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 10, p. e02690, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02690.

H. Park and S. Baek, “Measuring service quality of online bookstores with WebQual,” in Jacko, J.A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Applications and Services. HCI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4553. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73111-5_12.

S. J. Barnes and R. T. Vidgen, “Assessing the quality of auction Web sites,” Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, June 2001, p. 10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.927087.

E. T. Loiacono, R. T. Watson, and D. L. Goodhue, “WebQual: An instrument for consumer evaluation of Web sites,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 51–87, 2007, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110302.

R. Likert, “A technique for measurement of attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 5–55, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-11

How to Cite

Rerung, R. R., & Ramadhan, A. (2024). Website Quality Measurement of Educational Government Agency in Indonesia using Modified WebQual 4.0. International Journal of Computing, 23(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.23.1.3432

Issue

Section

Articles