Method of Maximizing F-Synergistic Value in IT Development Projects for Self-Managed Organizations

Authors

  • Sergey D. Bushuyev
  • Andrii V. Ivko
  • Halyna Lyakhovych

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.23.3.3655

Keywords:

program and project management, value approach, syncretic methodology, F-synergistic value maximizing method, self-managed organizations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the formulation of the method of maximizing the F-synergistic value of IT development projects of a project-oriented organization, which was developed within the syncretic methodology of project management. The application of the proposed method is considered in the field of IT development projects of organizations involved in infrastructure restoration projects of Ukraine. The directions of scientific research in the field of value-oriented project management are analyzed. The previously unsolved part of the scientific problem is highlighted. Objects of value analysis in a project-oriented organization carrying out IT development were identified, among which stellarator projects were highlighted. A model for determining the value of a separate component of the system is presented. The concept of F-synergistic value is defined. Such a value is proposed to be calculated through the aggregate value of three clusters that create synergistic effects both within themselves (first-order value) and among themselves (second-order value). The clusters included: "IT + people" cluster, "projects + operational activity" cluster, "methodology + environment" cluster. Models for determining the value of a separate cluster and the aggregate F-synergistic value are proposed. Variations in the selection of weighting factors for evaluating value criteria are considered. Within the syncretic methodology, a method of maximizing the F-synergistic value of IT development of a project-oriented company is proposed. The model of 27 scenarios of the dynamics of the change of the multipliers of synergy of three clusters is presented. In the corresponding tables for each scenario, a hypothesis is put forward regarding the reasons for such dynamics for each scenario, as well as a model of further IT development of a project-oriented company in response to such reasons. According to the results of the development of the method of maximizing the F-synergistic value of IT development projects of a project-oriented organization guided by syncretic methodology, directions for improving the activities of such organizations were determined. An extended SWOT analysis of the proposed method was conducted. Conclusions based on the research are formulated, prospects for further research in the chosen direction are outlined.

References

Decree of the President of Ukraine dated April 21, 2022, No. 266/2022 Questions of the National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of the War. [Online]. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/2662022-42225.

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated July 18, 2023 No. 731. On approval of procedures for the restoration and development of regions and territorial communities. [Online]. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennia-poriadkiv-z-pytan-vidnovlennia-ta-rozvytku-rehioniv-i-terytorialnykh-s731-180723

S. Bushuyev, A. Ivko, “Conceptual model of syncretic methodology data of development projects management for self-managed organizations,” Proceedings of the Information Technology and Implementation (IT&I-2023), November, 20-21, 2023, Kyiv, Ukraine. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2023, 3624, pp. 266–275. [Online]. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3624/Paper_22.pdf.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Sixth Edition, USA, Project Management Institute, 2017, 756 p.

The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Seventh Edition. USA, Project Management Institute, 2021, 250 p.

The Standard for Portfolio Management, Fourth Edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, 189 p.

BS ISO 21500:2021. Project, programme and portfolio management. Context and concepts. ISO, 2023, 32 p.

UNE ISO 21504:2023. Project, programme and portfolio management. Guidance on portfolio management. ISO, 43 p.

PRINCE2® Managing Successful Projects. Global Best Practice. PeopleCert, 2023, 347 p. ISBN 978-9925344604.

P2M Bibelot (Overview of P2M Third Edition), Project Management Association of Japan (PMAJ), June 2017. [Online]. Available at: https://www.pmaj.or.jp/ENG/p2m/p2m_guide/P2M_Bibelot(All)_R3.pdf.

H. Kerzner, Project Management 2.0: Leveraging Tools, Distributed Collaboration, and Metrics for Project Success, Wiley, 2015, 226 p.

J. Kelly, S. Male, D. Graham, Value Management of Construction Projects, 2nd edition, Chichester, England, Wiley Blackwell, 2014, 576 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119007258.

The Standard for Earned Value Management, (None Edition), USA, Project Management Institute, 2020, 150 p.

L. Wan, Y. Lv, Z. Wang, & Y. Tian, “The synergistic evolution of supply-demand composite system for airport green development: A case study in Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, China,” Plos one, vol. 19, issue 4, article e0302303, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302303.

R. R. Venkataraman, J. K. Pinto, Cost and Value Management in Projects, 2nd edition, Wiley, 2023, 381 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394207190.

I. A. Marushchak, “Models of the project of territorial development of project-oriented organizations with principle of valuable approach,” Management of Development of Complex Systems, no. 34, pp. 51-57, 2018.

V. Obradovic, M. Todorovic, S. Bushuyev, “Sustainability and agility in project management: contradictory or complementary?", Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 871, pp. 522-532, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01069-0_37.

T. Gillier, S. Hooge, G. Piat, “Framing value management for creative projects: An expansive perspective,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 947-960, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.11.002.

O. Savina, “Mathematical model of value-oriented portfolio management of high-tech enterprises projects,” Natural and Technical Sciences, Budapest, issue 2, pp. 36‒39, 2017.

O. Dunets, C. Wolff, A. Sachenko, G. Hladiy, I. Dobrotvor, “Multi-agent system of IT project planning,” Proceedings of the 2017 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), Bucharest, Romania, 2017, pp. 548-552, https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS.2017.8095141.

F. Laloux, Reinventing Organisations: A Guide to Creating Organisations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness, Nelson Parker, 2014, 382 p.

B. J. Robertson, How are holacracy-powered organizations different? Holacracy Foundation, 2020. [Online]. Available at: https://www.holacracy.org/explore/why-practice-holacracy

S. Mamoli, “Holacracy for humans,” The InfoQ eMag, issue 71, pp.10-17, 2019.

F. Di Maio, P. C. Rem, K. Baldé, M. Polder, “Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 122, pp. 163-171, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.009.

S. D. Bushuyev, A. V. Ivko, “Values spiral development method in the implementation of digitalization projects in syncretic methodology,” International Journal of Computing, vol. 23, issue 2, pp. 177-186, 2024. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.23.2.3535.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-11

How to Cite

Bushuyev, S. D., Ivko, A. V., & Lyakhovych, H. (2024). Method of Maximizing F-Synergistic Value in IT Development Projects for Self-Managed Organizations. International Journal of Computing, 23(3), 371-379. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.23.3.3655

Issue

Section

Articles